personal injury medical malpractice, lawyer, "lawyer", [best lawyers], [texas car accident], "motorcycle accident", indonesia lawyer, [lawyer], "best lawyers", "the lawyer jobs", [the lawyer jobs], injured in a car accident, attorney law office, "car accident california", the lawyer jobs, texas car accident, [become a solicitor], law firm lawyer, commercial lawyer
Wednesday, December 31, 2008
Blog post of funny traffic stops
Sunday, December 28, 2008
Consequences of Aggressive DUI Enforcement
Wednesday, December 24, 2008
Can't Afford a Lawyer?
Tuesday, December 23, 2008
DWI: To Blow or Not to Blow
Monday, December 22, 2008
Idaho Laws Protect Intellectual Property
Note that IP protection is often a matter of federal law. You may find links to resources about some of the relevant federal IP laws at this Tech-Lawyer blog post. Domain names, an important adjunct to trademarks as indicia of brand, are protected under the federal anti-cybersquatting statute, under World Trade Organization regimes, and otherwise.
For reference in using the summary below, you may find a table of contents for and links to Idaho statutes may be found here.
Some of the Idaho statutes protecting IP include the Communications Security Act (I.C. § 18-6701 et seq.), the Computer Crime Act (I.C. §§ 2201-02) (new statute providing felony prosecution), and many of the statutes found in Title 48 dealing with Monopolies and Trade Practices.
As to Title 48, some of the applicable statutes include Idaho’s Trademark Act (I.C. § 48-501, et seq.), portions of Idaho’s Consumer Protection Act (see particularly I.C. § 48-603), and Idaho’s Trade Secrets Act (I.C. § 48-801, et seq.).
In 2008, Idaho increased IP and related competitive protections regarding former employees and key independent contractors and enacted I.C. § 44-2701, et seq. covering Agreements and Covenants Protecting Legitimate Business Interests.
Further, if parties cooperate in the theft or misappropriation of IP rights or related information, then claims under racketeering and conspiracy statutes may also be available. See, e.g., I.C. § 18-7805.
In addition to statutory protections, common law protects against breaches of the duty of loyalty by directors and offices and against infringement of unregistered trademarks, for example.
For more information, please contact me at:
Emile Loza, JD, MBA, CLP
Managing Partner & Founder
E. eloza@TechnologyLawGroup.com
P. 208.939.4472
LinkedIn. http://www.linkedin.com/pub/dir/emile/loza
Thursday, December 18, 2008
Pringle Hearing and the DWI Prompt Suspension
Wednesday, December 17, 2008
Speed Cameras in New York State: Coming Soon?
Tuesday, December 9, 2008
Plaxico Burress - Are Hunting and Target Shooting Illegal in New York State?
Profile: The Master
Sunday, December 7, 2008
Florida Speeding Tickets
Saturday, December 6, 2008
DWI Defense Perspectives
Tuesday, December 2, 2008
More Verizon and Debt Collection
Monday, December 1, 2008
Keith Olbermann on Gay Marriage
Friday, November 28, 2008
BBC's Global Business - Entrepreneurship Interviews
Check out Mr. Day's interview on entrepreneurship with Carl Schram of the Kaufman Foundation and founder of the World Enterpreneurship Award. Here's the link.
This episode of Global Business focuses on innovation, the new economy, and Global Entrepreneurship Week.
Technology Law Group can help power the commercialization of your entrepreneurial venture.
To find out how, please contact us at 208.939.4472 or info@TechnologyLawGroup.com.
Friday, November 21, 2008
Profile: The Glory Hound
Monday, November 17, 2008
Dewey Cheatham & Howe
Sunday, November 16, 2008
Global Entrepreneurship Week Activities at Boise State University
The College of Business and Economics, the Idaho Small Business Development Center and the Entrepreneurship Center have developed the seminars that will be held from 3:15-4:30 p.m. each day in Room 404 of the Interactive Learning Center on the Boise State campus.
All sessions are free, but seating is limited to the first 40 people to register at www.IdahoSBDC.org. Parking is available in the Brady Parking Garage. For a map of both locations, see the Idaho SBDC link above.
The seminar schedule is as follows:
Nov. 18 - Young Entrepreneurs will provide background on their businesses and the challenges they face. Young entrepreneurs are the driving force behind much of the innovative products and services we see today.
Ryan Woodings - MetaGeek
Becky Louge - The Dental R.A.T.
J. Glerum - Valitics / Check A Biz
Nov. 19 - Hispanic entrepreneurs are a growing part of Idaho's entrepreneurial community. Three successful entrepreneurs will share their experiences.
Enrique Camarillo, Molly Maid
Emile Loza, Technology Law Group PLLC
Nov. 20 - Angel investors will provide a picture of equity investing, taking into account the banking crisis and its impact on equity investing.
Kevin Learned, Boise Angel Alliance
Dave Light - PakSense
Dozens of countries are participating in Global Entrepreneurship Week activities Nov. 17-21.
The initiative aims to inspire young people to embrace innovation, imagination and creativity and to turn their ideas into reality. See http://www.unleashingideas.org for more information.
For questions about Boise State's entrepreneurship week activities, contact Katie Sewell at 426-3838 or ksewell@boisestate.edu, or Kent Neupert at ext. 426-2397 or kneupert@boisestate.edu.
Saturday, November 15, 2008
Craig Watkins: A Great Prosecutor
Friday, November 14, 2008
Costa Rica: Some Thoughts
Wednesday, November 12, 2008
Costa Rica Day 3: Better Driving and More Xandari
Sunday, November 9, 2008
Costa Rica Day 2: Manuel Antonio and the Americana Fea
Saturday, November 8, 2008
Costa Rica Day 1: Poas Volcano, Uglier Driving and Gorgeous Gaia
Costa Rica: Ugly Driving and Beautiful Xandari
Monday, October 27, 2008
TruPhone for iPhone
Partner Dossiers - Strategic Intelligence is Key to the Best Deals!
PARTNER DOSSIERS are key to this valuable strategic intelligence.
The price of this strategic intelligence varies depending upon the client's budget, whether the prospective partner is a domestic or foreign company, how complex the partner's organization is, and the number and type of special reports that need to be purchased as inputs for the strategic analysis of the partner.
The benefits to being armed with strategic intelligence prior to negotiations, however, make the spend well worth it.
For example, a prolifically-innovative business was approached with a license agreement for a particular automotive invention. The pay-off for the business was $100,000 in an upfront royalty fee. The prospective licensee was a successful mom-and-pop towing business operating in several locations in the Midwest.
The business came to us to review the deal, already agreed in principle. To advise our client properly, we conducted in-depth research and compiled a Partner Dossier on the prospective licensee.
What we learned was a shock to the client! The licensee turned out to be a small subsidiary of a New York Stock Exchange-traded company worth hundreds of millions of dollars. Furthermore, the company had an exclusive contract for the Australian military and a similar contract in Germany to which our client's invention was perfectly positioned to contribute in a big way. Properly compensated, that deal should have easily run into the several hundreds of thousands of dollars, if not $1 million or more.
The proposed licensing agreement presented by the mom-and-pop business also attempted to exploit the kind of "aw shucks" ruse by which it had approached our client. The rights to be licensed by our client would, under than agreement, flow through the mom-and-pop straight to the NYSE parent company.
Fortunately, our strategic intelligence, along with the intellectual property rights flow analysis it enabled, helped the client have the information it needed to avoid a bad deal and put it on a more equal footing with its partner.
For more on how Partner Dossiers can assist you in getting the best possible deals for your business, please contact us at 208.939.4472 or info@TechnologyLawGroup.com.
If you want to opt out for future emails about TLG blog posts, please email info@TechnologyLawGroup.com.
Sunday, October 26, 2008
Licensing Software in a Global Market
My very knowledgeable co-presenters on the panel talked about licensing in India and in China. Both jurisdictions have licensing limitations and software royalties and other treatments and rules that are important to know before you enter an agreement.
For more on licensing in India and China, please contact me at 208.939.4472 or eloza@TechnologyLawGroup.com.
My presentation focused on three key cross-jurisdictional points:
1. The tactical advantages and uses of STRATEGIC INTELLIGENCE in the negotiation and ongoing compliance and enforcement work for licensing agreements;
2. The GLOBAL HARMONIZATION OF LICENSING TERMS for greater efficiencies in terms of legal fees and contract management; and
3. The maximization of "home-bound" income using TAX TREATY-OPTIMIZED TERMS.
I'll spend the next several blog posts drilling down on these topics and telling some interesting "war stories" to illustrate them.
If you'd like to have a copy of my presentation or to discuss any topic in detail, please contact me using the information provided above.
Tuesday, October 21, 2008
Van Nuys Traffic Court and Britney Spears
Monday, October 20, 2008
Loza Presents on International Software Licensing
My presentation will focus on licensing software in a global market. I will emphasize the analysis of divergent laws and best practices for achieving legally-sound software agreements across multiple foreign jurisdictions.
I will draw on my experience in licensing software distributed online to such diverse jurisdictions as Malta, China, and the European Union. In addition, I will address best practices for due diligence and enforcement in Taiwan, Korea, and Japan.
Attorneys from Baker McKenzie and from Mumbai's Thacker & Thacker will join me on the podium to discuss licensing in China and India, respectively.
For more information and copy of the conference program, click the title of this post. For more on how we here at Technology Law Group can support your software licensing business, please contact us at 208.939.4472 or info@technologylawgroup.com.
Wednesday, October 15, 2008
Federal PRO-IP Bill Enacted
The U.S. Chamber reports on the signing at its Global IP Summit. For more, click here.
TLG can help protect your intellectual property assets. For more, call us at 208.939.4472 or email us at info@technologylawgroup.com.
Monday, October 13, 2008
Why hire a traffic lawyer?
Wednesday, October 8, 2008
U.S. Chamber Backs PRO-IP Act
He also rightly includes the protection and enforceability of intellectual property rights as a foundational requirement for that innovation-driven development.
Click here for the full article posted on the U.S. Chamber's Web site.
The article contains a brief note about Congress' recent passage of the Prioritizing Resources and Organization for Intellectual Property Act (PRO-IP Act).
The House of Representatives passed its version of the PRO-IP Act in May 2008. (Click here for H.R. 4279)
The Senate passed its version of the bill on September 26, 2008. (Click here for a news report.)The Chamber sees this bill as a positive way to protect American-owned intellectual property rights and to elevate this protection in the Administration. Although the Senate bill is narrower than the House version, some regard PRO-IP Act as controversial, including for provisions that may require the Department of Justice to enforce privately-held copyright registrations.
The online Chamber article offers a comment function. Add your voice there.
Criminal Defense Lawyer Thoughts
Lawyer Thoughts
Saturday, October 4, 2008
Criminal Defense: Some of our clients are criminals
Are police tougher on out-of-state drivers?
Sunday, September 28, 2008
The Secret to Writing a Lawyer Blog
Sunday, September 21, 2008
Legislative Agenda for Idaho's Tech Community
Representatives Mike Moyle and Raul Labrador and Senate candidate Chuck Winder recently met with technology business leaders and enthusiasts at the invitation of the Eagle Chamber of Commerce.
The group discussed the Chamber's legislative agenda in detail. (ESTECH Group Members - See my Sept. 11 email.)
Representative Moyle issued a call for the technology community to come forth with legislative agenda of its own.
I would expand that call to include actions that Governor Otter and the Department of Commerce and other executive branch agencies could undertake to support our success.
Norris Krueger has also begun a white paper on Google Docs: https://docs.google.com/Doc?docid=dd39r2qq_70dsfnxjfx&hl=en.
For more on our legislative and policy development efforts, please contact us at info@technologylawgroup.com or 208.939.4472.
Thursday, September 11, 2008
Traffic Court - New Heights!
Wednesday, September 10, 2008
Albany DWI Seminar
Sunday, September 7, 2008
Vote for Steven Vasquez
Sunday, August 31, 2008
10 Great Things About Albany
Friday, August 29, 2008
Insanity in the Computer Age
Wednesday, August 27, 2008
Online Piracy and Payment Providers
PayPal, Google Checkout, and Authorize.net are three commonly used online payment processing systems.
Fraudulent transactions are often a problem with online sale and distribution of software and online content. For example, the fraudulent operators may phish PayPal accounts, placed orders using those phished accounts, obtained license keys to the software, and downloaded the software, likely for illegal resale. In some instances, the purchases were geotracked to eastern Europe, in others to various locations here in the United States.
There are a number of technological and legal approaches to dealing with online piracy, including cross-border piracy. There are services that help detect and combat fraud and phishing, such as those offered by Kount and MarkMonitor.
For more information, please contact us at info@technologylawgroup.com or 208.939.4472.
Tuesday, August 26, 2008
Albany Lawn Care and Snow Plowing
Website Economics
Thursday, August 14, 2008
Frustrated Lawyers
Monday, August 11, 2008
El Dorado Superior Court
Sunday, August 10, 2008
Albany Websites
Women & Entrepreneurship: Have We Unlocked the Secret to Success?
I started Technology Law Group in a spare bedroom with that single, excellent opportunity. Now in our sixth year, I reflect upon what a rewarding, challenging, and inspiring journey entrepreneurship is.
Entrepreneurship in the legal profession is unusual. The profession has time-honored ways of doing things. Over centuries, men have created these ways of approaching client projects and organizing and running law firms. Men similarly predominate in science, in technology, in banking. The list goes on.
Women are recent entrants into the external workforce. America’s need for productive capacity during World War II brought women out of the home and reshaped them and their self-perceptions as economically and otherwise powerful. Who can forget Rosy the Riveter, that symbol of vibrant, feminine strength?
Women entrepreneurs are an even more recent phenomenon, and I often reflect on what it means to effectively lead and compete as a woman in two male-predominant professions, technology and the law.
Without question, some men are extraordinarily supportive of my endeavors as a woman entrepreneur. Likewise, I deeply value my mentors who are women. Still, entrepreneurship is a tough business.
When I received an invitation to write an article for the University of Pepperdine Law School’s Journal of Business, Entrepreneurship, and the Law, I jumped at the chance.
It is an opportunity to critically examine how women entrepreneurs operate, what special challenges we face, and how we effectively compete. Would the answers be different than for men? Do women run businesses differently than men? Do women have unique strengths that enable them to succeed when men would not to the same degree? And, why are there so few women like me out there, leading businesses, convincing political leaders and funding sources to support the innovation community, competing and winning?
To answer these questions, I harnessed the power of online social networking and posted them on LinkedIn. LinkedIn, a social networking site used by more than 24 million professionals worldwide, is a powerful business tool.
Answers to my LinkedIn questions came from across the United States, from India, South Africa, Japan, the United Kingdom, and Denmark. Commentators include single entrepreneurial moms like me, professors, investors, media professionals, change management experts, and others.
Most say that women entrepreneurs operate at a disadvantage as compared to men. They say women have to work harder, smarter, and more creatively to succeed.
The principle reason, they say, is because women’s entrepreneurial success is directly tied to power, a woman’s willingness to embrace and leverage her power as a business innovator. Women are more than willing to take the calculated risks that all entrepreneurs take. They make the tough and necessary choices to integrate the hard work of entrepreneurship with the hard work of parenting and running a household. Women have the smarts, guts, and ambition to succeed as entrepreneurs.
Yet, women are a small minority of entrepreneurs. Why?
Some say that our social history with its rigidly-defined gender roles and lack of acceptance of women in the work force is the reason. They say investors, prospective customers, and other people critical to business success hold tightly to these historical perspectives without ever considering the resulting biases in their decisions to do (or not to do) business with women entrepreneurs.
Women flexing their power as business leaders are often viewed disparagingly, as masculine, and therefore unacceptable as women. Men using power are viewed as . . . well . . . powerful, and we respect and admire them for it. When will we likewise respect and admire powerful entrepreneurial women?
Some say that women themselves harbor a flawed notion that it is somehow wrong to have and exercise power, that women haven’t given themselves permission to be powerful. Because women are often ambivalent about their power, they are ineffective at using it. The failure to use power fully and effectively means the failure to achieve entrepreneurial success. This is true for all entrepreneurs and particularly for women.
As I continue work on the Pepperdine article, I gain insight into how I and other entrepreneurs work, how we leverage our power to introduce an innovative pricing model or otherwise add value to our services, how we best help our clients achieve their goals. It is a personal and community inquiry of critical importance to all entrepreneurs, to all who serve and do business with them, and to all who aspire to become them.
I am completing the article now. If you would like to receive a copy of the final piece, please drop me a note at eloza@technologylawgroup.com.
Saturday, August 9, 2008
2008 Honda Accord
Thursday, August 7, 2008
Local and Unique
Sunday, August 3, 2008
Milestones on the web
Saturday, August 2, 2008
Tax Benefits of Leasing a Car - IRS Depreciation Limits
Thursday, July 24, 2008
Albany Criminal Lawyer
Tuesday, July 22, 2008
Speeding tickets and GPS
Tuolumne County Superior Court - Interesting Grand Jury Report
Sunday, July 20, 2008
A different take on traffic court
Friday, July 11, 2008
Albany Lawyer in the News
Friday, July 4, 2008
Women & Entrepreneurship: Your Thoughts?
I am writing on the topic of women and entrepreneurship, a crucial subject in economic development and a rising area of legal scholarship.
As part of my research this month, I am inviting views and stories from both women and men.
To participate through LinkedIn, please click here. You may also participate by posting comments on this blog. To stimulate your thinking, I have posted two questions below. Please respond to any or all.
I plan to attribute comments that I use in the article to their contributors. If you prefer to remain anonymous, please so indicate in your response.
I earlier published in the Idaho State Bar's The Advocate regarding my own adventures in entrepreneurship. Here's a link to that article. For more information, please contact me at 208.939.4472 or info@technologylawgroup.com.
Thank you in advance for your answers and input.
1. What special issues do women entrepreneurs face?
2. How may women entrepreneurs maximize their opportunities for success?
Real Estate in Albany
Thursday, July 3, 2008
Lawyers Marketing on the Web: Controversy
Wednesday, June 25, 2008
Los Angeles Traffic Court story
Certified Pre-Owned and Leasing
Sunday, June 22, 2008
Google Analytics, Dublin and Digiweb
Technology Start-Ups Rejoice! Value-Based Pricing is Here!
The road less traveled can be rocky for technology start-ups, however. Major hurdles arise often because they avoid engaging attorneys up-front for fear of high and unpredictable legal fees.
This means that start-ups often come to us with thorny legal problems to solve. These problems often could have been avoided had they engaged us as Partners early on. Under the traditional billable-hour approach to legal fees, attempts to resolve those thorny problems can become significant financial burdens to start-ups. Not a pretty picture!
To make partnership with Technology Law Group more accessible for start-ups and to help our clients prevent problems from arising in the first place, we will begin offering fixed-fee Value-Based Pricing for key intellectual property and Internet legal services that are especially important for start-ups.
Please check out our Idaho Business Review announcement tomorrow, June 23rd, and contact us at 208.939.4472 or info@technologylawgroup.com. Let us know what you think!
Saturday, June 21, 2008
New speeding ticket pages
Friday, June 20, 2008
Obama Asks How Innovation Can Make America More Competitive
Thursday, June 19, 2008
Idaho's Tech Economy Stats
A number of recent publications and reports have highlighted our innovation economy. Below is a start at compiling statistics contained in these reports. As the numbers show, Idaho presents opportunities for innovators and for those who work to promote innovation-focused economic development in the state.
#1 in Patents Per Capita
#1 in Manufacturing Investment
#3 in Energy Costs
#5 in Long-Term Employment Growth
#5 in Net Migration of Residents
#5 in Renewable Energy Potential
#6 in “Entrepreneurial Energy” (2007 Corporation For Enterprise Development; for more details of the CFED report, please click here.)
#6 in New Company Creation
#8 in Resident Home Ownership
#10 in Households With Computers
From the American Electronics Association's 2008 Cyberstates Report, Idaho ranks:
#6 in semiconductor manufacturing employment (12,100 jobs)
#9 in computer & peripheral equipment manufacturing employment (3700 jobs)
#10 in concentration of technology workers (68 people per 1000 work in the technology industry, compared with Virginia, the state with the highest concentration, at 91 per 1000)
#28 in average high technology wages ($67,200/year, and 107% of average private sector wages)
#32 in high technology payroll ($2.4 billion)
#35 in high technology employment (36,400 people out of 5.9 million nationwide)
#35 in venture capital investment ($16.2 million out of $16.9 billion nationwide)
#35 in spending on research & development ($1 billion)
#39 in number of high technology companies (1800)*
Static numbers, however, don't tell the whole story. Note the changes in the AEA statistics from 2006 to 2007:
Big boost in venture capital investment - Up 977% from a mere $1.5 million**
Flat high technology employment overall - 200 new jobs added.
Semiconductor manufacturing employment - 900 new jobs added.
Friday, June 13, 2008
The Testiliar and Barney Fife
Thursday, June 12, 2008
Traffic Court Hits 75K
Judicial salaries
Wednesday, June 11, 2008
Loza Earns Certified Licensing Professional Designation
The United States & Canada Society of Licensing Executives Society International, the world’s largest association of intellectual property licensing professionals, awards this important credential. To my understanding, the CLP designation is the world's only professional credential for intellectual property licensing professionals.
The standards for achieving the Certified Licensing Professional credential are educational and experiential, requiring demonstrated leadership, proficiency, and skill in these eight domains:
- Intellectual property (IP) strategy;
- IP protection;
- IP valuation;
- Assessment and development of opportunities to commercialize and monetize intellectual property;
- Marketing IP;
- Licensing negotiations;
- Development and drafting of licensing agreements; and
- Post-execution management and enforcement of licensing agreements, including agreements impacting licensing, e.g., manufacturing and design contracts.
It is an honor to receive this important recognition. My work over the years for Hewlett-Packard Company, Nikon, a Jet Propulsion Laboratory spin-off, a genetic research and testing firm, and other companies has enabled me to attain this leading-edge professional achievement.
Technology Law Group, PLLC is an intellectual property, international, and Internet law and technology legislative practice based in Boise, Idaho. TLG’s practice has a global and strategic business-driven focus. TLG serves a wide range of representative clients from the world’s largest technology company and other Fortune 1000 companies to leading academic institutions to innovation entrepreneurs, and general business and litigation law firms.
For more information about how we can assist with intellectual property licensing and other transactions, please contact us at info@technologylawgroup.com or 208.939.4472.
Friday, June 6, 2008
Prosecutors: Some Things Never Change
Thursday, June 5, 2008
China's New Anti-monopoly Law Goes Into Effect August 1, 2008
Promulgated on August 30 of last year, the new law is set to go into effect on August 1, 2008. The law governs monopolistic activity occurring within China and that occuring outside of China, but affecting the Chinese domestic market.
In addition to addressing monopolistic activity, the law addresses concerns by the Chinese authorities about increasing foreign control and influence of and upon companies there.
We can make available an English translation of the new law and and other related ABA Conference materials. In particular, you may want to examine an excellent slide deck presentation by Zhu Zhongliang, the Chinese Ministry of Commerce's Deputy Division Chief of the Anti-monopoly Investigation Office. The Ministry's English language Web site is at http://english.mofcom.gov.cn/.
For more information, please contact us at info@technologylawgroup.com or 208.939.4472.
Social Networking, User-Generated Content & Risk Management
In part, new media marketing success depends upon effective community-building and that, in turn, depends upon content generated by members of the target community.
GoSleepGo.com is a new, fun, and edgy example. It's a user-built online travel guide in which far-flung 20-somethings (generally) go around the world and log on to post their travel photos and comments. Here's a user adventured posted about North Korea's Propaganda Village. BACKGROUND: GoSleepGo won first prize in the 2007 University of Idaho VIEW Business Plan competition put on by the College of Business & Economics.
Online contracts governing users' conduct and interaction with the marketer's Web site (consumer agreement titled "terms of use," "acceptable use policy," etc.) are fundamental instruments in limiting legal risk. Along with other online contracts that govern user conduct on their sites, Facebook and MySpace's general terms of use provide good examples of these risk management instruments.
That said, a online marketer may be well-advised to operate under an affirmative duty to monitor user content posted by members of its target community or to respond promptly to complaints sent to customer service email addresses.
In a recent example of the former, a Web marketer designated an individual as a discussion moderator. In the course of one of these discussions, the moderator then allegedly libeled one of the parties to the discussion. Under an agency theory, the marketer (principal) could be held responsible for the libelous conduct of its moderator (agent).
One recent example of the duty to respond to emailed complaints, a MySpace participant posted an invitation on his profile to view sexual content featuring minors and also posted links directing viewers to those postings on XTube, a pornographic site. In that instance, MySpace responded and terminated the poster's participation in its community. XTube, however, was non-responsive to complaints until the federal criminal authorities were involved.
Online marketers may face other legal risks as a result of user-generated content, including, among others:
- Infringement of trademarks or copyrights;
- Privacy violations;
- Invasion of publicity rights; and
- Consumer protection violations, including posting of false or misleading advertisements.
In addition to excellent consumer agreements, a number of other best practices can go far to limit risk associated with user-generated content. For more information, please contact us at info@technologylawgroup.com or 208.939.4472.
Monday, June 2, 2008
Film Festival for Albany Indie Team
Sunday, June 1, 2008
Albany Ron Paul Meetup
Friday, May 30, 2008
Smelly Returns
Thursday, May 22, 2008
China's New Law on Resolving Employment Disputes May Enhance Intellectual Property Protections
That law went into effect on May 1, 2008 and is touted as a significant improvement over the prior law, improving fairness in the treatment of employees and employers and improving efficiencies. Among the advantages of the new law include that it expands the scope of cases that courts will accept and the statutory limitation period. It also increases opportunities for mediation and arbitration and significantly improves both of these alternative dispute resolution mechanisms.
Of particular interest regarding disputes involving intellectual property that may arise under employment contracts containing non-disclosure or related provisions, this new law applies pursuant to Article 2(2).
Under Article 23, a third-party with a material interest in the outcome of a dispute may apply to receive notice or otherwise participate in arbitration proceedings. This may provide a significant opportunity for U.S. and other companies with Chinese design or manufacturing partners to better protect their intellectual property interests.
The protection of these interests are generally required by U.S.-to-China design or OEM agreements, for example, where the Chinese company is required to put employment contracts in place by which its employees are bound by the same or substantially similar non-disclosure obligations to those that bind the employing entity. Such provisions extending to employees are included in these outsourcing and supplies contracts as a matter of best practices.
Prior to the new law, however, these provisions were largely regarded as unenforceable in China where piracy and industrial espionage are notorious and where the exclusivity of intellectual property rights is still a developing concept. From intellectual property and international transactions perspectives, China's new labor dispute law may be a welcome change indeed.
For the full text of the new law in English or for more information about Technology Law Group's international practice, please contact us at +1.208.939.4472 or info@technologylawgroup.com or visit our Web site at http://www.technologylawgroup.com/.
Update - Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements
Recently, the ABA's International Litigation Committee was in communication with the U.S. State Department's David Stewart, Assistant Legal Adviser for Private International Law in the Office of Legal Affairs, about the Convention and progress toward its ratification.
Mr. Stewart advised that the current focus is on issues regarding the Convention's implementation. The State Department, after its evaluation, forwards a memorandum to the President requesting authority to sign the desired convention. Before State forwards its signature memorandum as to this Convention, it requires a clear understanding as to how the Convention might be implemented. Mr. Stewart and his staff are working on the drafting of a tentative federal statute, but he states that considerable concern exists as to whether solely federalizing the issues addressed by the Convention is the optimum approach.
The National Conference on Commissioners on Uniform State Laws (NCCUSL) is actively evaluating how a uniform state law might be structured. A NCCUSL Drafting Committee, chaired by Idaho Uniform Law Commissioner, Rex Blackburn, is at work in that regard.
State will consider how NCCUSL's draft uniform state law and the draft federal statute might be integrated. That said, State expects to issue its signing memorandum shortly.
For more information about our international legal services, please contact us at +1.208.939.4472 or info@technologylawgroup.com or visit our Web site at http://www.technologylawgroup.com.
Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements - Backgrounder
In terms familiar to those drafting contracts in common law countries like the United States, the Convention establishes conditions under which the parties may contractually agree to consent to exclusive personal jurisdiction in a particular state or federal court.
Late last fall, Mexico became the first state to accede to the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements. The American Bar Association has urged that the United States adopt, ratify, and implement the Convention. See Background Note, infra.
The Convention sets forth the rules by which parties in different countries prospectively agree to resolve civil or commercial disputes in an agreed forum. Further, judgments in those agreed fora must be enforced by the courts in other countries adopting the Convention, provided exceptions do not apply.
The Convention sets forth a number of public policy exceptions to its applicability. Of importance to our intellectual property clients and constituencies, the Convention is not applicable to certain intellectual property matters. Specifically, the Convention does not govern in matters regarding the invalidity of intellectual property rights (excluding copyright and related rights) and regarding infringement of intellectual property rights that occur or could be brought under contract law (again, excluding copyright and related rights). See Articles 2 (2)(n)-(o) & 10(3).
For more information about the assistance we can provide in international transactional matters, please contact us at +1.208.939.4472 or info@technologylawgroup.com.
BACKGROUND NOTE: As the development of the positive international law (treaty law) goes, conventions, once concluded, are then opened for accession by states (countries), both members of the Hague Convention and non-members. Once agreed by the specified number of states, the Convention then enters into force. This process of adoption and implementation, that is, the incorporation of the treaty's principles into the domestic law, takes several years. Note, however, that treaties may become evidence of binding customary international law even without their entry into force. Generally and in addition, parties may opt in to the applicability of a treaty even if that treaty has not yet entered into force.
Wednesday, May 21, 2008
Supreme Court Rules Emails Offering/Seeking Online Child Porn Not Protected Speech
Law enforcement officials praise the decision as enabling them to more efficiently combat criminal acts surrounding and depicting the sexual abuse of children. The decision is one of an ongoing judicial rulings on legislative attempts to balance free speech rights against the need to protect children from the rampant and insidious criminal activity.
For more information, see this report by David Savage in The Los Angeles Times. The Court's decision in United States v. Williams is available here.
For more information about Internet law-related matters, please contact us at info@technologylawgroup.com or +1.208.939.4472.
Monday, May 19, 2008
New York Traffic Courts: The Surcharge Tax Increase
Saturday, May 17, 2008
Albany DWI and DA Soares' New Policy
Tuesday, May 13, 2008
David Soares and Citizen Action
Wednesday, April 30, 2008
Rensselaer Train Station
Friday, April 25, 2008
What do lawyers do? Diversifying the revenue stream
Vermont Traffic Courts
Tuesday, April 22, 2008
More Traffic Court News
Monday, April 21, 2008
More Disputes Going Before China's Courts
The article also reports some encouraging statistics that reflect on the rule of law in China. It cites a March 2008 State Supreme Court work report that China's courts handled almost 32 million cases from 2003 through 2007. That's up 1.6% over the previous four-year period (1998-2002).
The Shanghai courts saw a much larger increase in their case loads, however, which were up 10% during the same time period. This finding about the Shanghai courts is consistent with observations by my colleagues in the Licensing Executives Society and the American Bar Association's China Committee that courts in certain Chinese cities, Shanghai among them, are becoming more educated as to intellectual property rights and more reliable as fora for the resolution of intellectual property disputes.
To read the China News article, click here. For an excellent list of China resources compiled by the ABA's China Committee, click here.
For more information about doing business in China and with Chinese companies, please contact us at +1.208.939.4472 or info@technologylawgroup.com.
Sunday, April 20, 2008
Doing Business in China? Check Out This Recommended Reading!
With more than 500 attorney members around the world, the China Committee is a joint body of the ABA's International Law, Intellectual Property Law, and Science and Technology practice sections.
The China Committee's recommended reading includes books covering topics ranging from China's place in the global economy to the consumer products market there to histories that elucidate Chinese cultural and business philosophies.
I have gathered these titles together for you here in the new Resources link. You'll find the link on the right side of this page above the blog archive listing. Click here and you'll go to our Amazon store to see all the China titles.
You will also see a collection of the TLG team's favorite resources on entrepreneurship, intellectual property strategy, women in science and technology, and more. Because we support Science Olympiad and other programs to foster children's creativity and natural interest in science and technology, we've even put together a set of excellent chemistry sets, books, and other great products to help Kids Create!
To discuss more about your business activities and plans in China, please contact us at +1.208.939.4472 or info@technologylawgroup.com.
Saturday, April 19, 2008
San Diego Criminal Court - The Marine Widow Case
Friday, April 18, 2008
Chinese Intellectual Property Cases Online
The Web site is principally in Chinese language. The search engine operates in English and Chinese. One may search by litigant name, court, filing date, case number, and cause of action.
Just enter search terms in English, and the site returns a list of search results in Chinese, but with some English labeling. The decisions are in Chinese, but no worries! We have Chinese linguistics on our team.
The Web site's navigation bar to the left also has English labels for types of actions: trademarks, copyright and related rights, patents, unfair competition, plant varieties, technology contracts, and others.
Among the Others category are cases involving integrated circuit ("IC") design and cases involving discovery and innovation. (RESOURCE NOTE: For a detailed, albeit 2003, analysis of China's IC design protection law, click here.)
Under Article 134 of China's Civil Procedural Law, "The people's court shall publicly pronounce its judgment in all cases, whether publicly tried or not." (RESOURCE NOTE: For the text of this law, click here.) Further, Article 8 of the 1993 Supreme Court's Rules in Court of the People's Court states that "citizens may audit the court session of cases which are publicly tried according to law."
That said, the courts appear to have some discretion regarding publication, having, for example, no time frame within which they must publish their decisions and no requirements as to the methods of such required publication.
For more information, please reach us at +1.208.939.4472 or info@technologylawgroup.com.
Monday, April 14, 2008
Los Angeles Traffic Courts
Thursday, April 10, 2008
Lawyer websites and font size
Wednesday, April 9, 2008
Is Tibet A Country?
For those of you who have been following the compelling stories of political unrest in Tibet and China's intervention there, this post will be particularly interesting.
The term "suzertainty" refers to a principle first seen in feudal law and later used in more modern (late 1800s) positive law in which one country is a vassal state to other. Parts of the Ottoman Empire, e.g., Egypt, Bulgaria, Romania, and others, were organized this way.
The vassal is described as an independent state that gives up some, but not all, of its autonomy to the suzerain state in exchange for certain obligations flowing back to the vassal state.
(RESOURCE NOTE: For an excellent summary of the history of the term "suzertainty" with references, click here.)
Unraveling the legal status of Tibet takes one through the period of British colonialism in the region and later through one or more treaties between Britain and imperial Russian, later cancelled by the Communist government, and through the 1950 invasion by China of Tibet to the present day. A partial timeline of the historical development of Tibet's legal status follows.
One discussion, attributed to Sir Algemon Rumbold, President of the Tibet Society of the United Kingdom from 1977-1988, says that Britain treated Tibet as an independent state from 1910, but stated in 1912 and again 1943 that it acknowledged the suzertainty of China in Tibet, but on the condition that Tibet's autonomy was respected. The latter is cited Memorandum from Sir Anthony Eden to the Chinese Foreign Minister, T.V. Soong, FO371/93001 (May 8, 1943).
Some say that Tibet initially declared independence in 1912, a position apparently agreed by the British government, which treated Tibet as independent from 1910 or from 1912, depending on the commentator. Others say that that 1912 and two subsequent declarations, at least through 1965 or so, did not amount to declarations. See Alfred P. Rubin, Tibet's Declarations of Independence, 60 AM. J. INT'L L. 812-14 (1966).
The 1914 Simla Convention between Great Britain and Tibet established or purported to establish internationally-recognized boundaries, the McMahon Line, for an independent Tibet. China refused that Convention, and Sir Rumbold writes that it was a that point that Tibet repudiated China's suzertainty.
On September 19, 2006, the Declaration of Independence of the Nations of High Asia: Tibet, East Turkistan and Inner Mongolia was made in Washington, D.C. at the Capitol Building.
Although not a thorough analysis of the question of Tibet's legal status, the foregoing indicates that Tibet is indeed a separate country.
For more information on international law, please contact us at +1.208.939.4472 or info@technologylawgroup.com.
Thursday, April 3, 2008
Albany Public Relations
Tuesday, April 1, 2008
Schenectady DWI
Gmail April Fools Joke Got Me
Monday, March 31, 2008
Facebook gay ads
Intellectual Property Registration Still Nascent in China, but Growing
Only a minority of these large companies have formalized intellectual property rights, however. Fewer than nine percent (8.7%), or 26,000, applied for patents from 2004 through 2006. Fewer than one-quarter (24.3%), or 73,000, registered their trademarks, although more than one-third (38.4%) registered their own brands. Finally, only about one-fifth (20.7%) had company policies to protect their trade secrets.
Sunday, March 30, 2008
Traffic Court continues to grow
Saratoga vs. Albany on Google
Thursday, March 27, 2008
AdWords and AdSense Customer Support: Are Dark Clouds Moving in Over Google
Tuesday, March 25, 2008
Trial Lawyers and the Feeling of Victory
Sunday, March 23, 2008
Issue-Spotting for Web Sites
Up-front attention to these issues when Web sites are first being developed and hosted can save time, money, and legal wrangling later. Here, Benjamin Franklin was right! "An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure."
Read on for some of the important legal issues to consider regarding Web sites. Also, check out the Resource Notes at the bottom.
Ownership and Control
One may view Internet domain names as a form of intellectual property, that is, an intangible property right belonging exclusively to the owner of that right. One establishes the property right by registration with a domain name registrar, such as NSI (formerly Network Solutions, Inc.), or by purchasing the domain name from an intermediary or auction sites, such as SnapNames.com. As strange as it may seem in dealing with a property right, the ownership and control of Web sites are common problems faced by many businesses.
For example, individuals may purchase an existing business, believing that the domain name by which that business is promoted online was part of the acquired business. They may later discover that title to the domain name, i.e., the registration, did not rest with the seller, but rather with the business’s former Web site developer, who decides to try to usurp the value of the business for his own aims or to leverage his control of the essential domain name to extract exorbitant Web hosting or other fees from the new owners.
Other businesses may hire a marketing or Web development company to acquire one or more domains and to build a Web site for it. Conflicts arise over payment, quality, or other issues, and the business now finds itself having invested thousands of dollars into an e-commerce site tied to a crucial domain name that its vendor owns and controls.
Just as issues arise as to domain name ownership, there can be issues as to the ownership of the source code that makes up the Web site. Many smaller businesses may contract out for the development of their Web sites and may rely upon oral contracts or contracts comprised of oral and electronic mail exchanges. These informal agreements leave much to be desired and are rife with ambiguity.
Businesses may assume that they own the Web site’s source code when indeed that title remains with the Web developer. This ownership issue can create problems where the ongoing maintenance of the Web site remains tied to the Web developer, perhaps at an inappropriate price for the business. Even where formal Web development contracts are executed between the parties, these may be drafted to the Web developer’s advantage, and ownership rights may not transfer under those agreements.
Many Web site developers now use Open Source tools for their development activities. There are many dozens of Open Source license agreements that govern what can be done with the Web sites and other products that result from the use of various Open Source components. These agreements may permit some ownership rights to be transferred to the business purchasing the Web site development services.
More frequently, however, these agreements prohibit or severely restrict the transfer of ownership rights. (Indeed, version 3.0 of the GNU General Public License is far more restrictive in this regard than version 2.0.) This means that a business may pay a Web developer to create a certain look-and-feel or special navigational aids for the Web site, but may not have absolute or any ownership rights therein. In such an instance, the business may have no ability to legally prohibit the Web developer’s use of that customization for subsequent clients.
Intellectual Property Liability
Business owners may select corporate names and purchase domain names for their businesses without considering whether the effect that selection may have on their risk profiles. For example, the selection of a corporate or domain name may infringe upon existing trademark rights. If it does not infringe an existing mark outright, the company may still face liability from allegations that the domain name dilutes the value of famous trademarks.
Copyright infringement is another concern principally regarding the content of the Web site. Here, there are issues as to whether the textual content of the site was copied from another source. Images and other graphical or visual content on the Web pages may be purchased through Web sites like BigStockImages.com. Because the license agreements that govern those purchases are generally very one-sided to favor the purveyor of that content, one must exercise care to understand and retain a record of the agreement and to ensure that the content is being used in accordance with the terms of the agreement. For example, the inbound license agreement may permit the use of the purchased images online, but not in printed collateral marketing materials.
Terms of Use
Many businesses fail to set forth on their Web sites the terms of use that govern the Web visitors use of the sites. Others may incorporate some terms of use in the text of some Web pages, but may not set forth a single contract encompassing all use of the site. Still others may have terms of use that deal with more traditional aspects of a brick-and-mortar business, such as return policies, but may not consider the intellectual property aspects of the business’ online presence. As an example, the Web site may set forth an invitation to call a contact person for licensing the business’ trademarks. Such vague language engenders the position that a mere phone call to the named individual suffices for the caller to obtain a royalty-free, inbound license to the logos contained in, and often easily copied from, the Web site.
Linking policies are another contractual control that businesses often fail to include. These policies set for the terms under which other Web sites can link to the business’ Web site. Absent these policies, linking may occur freely, and the business may find itself associated with Web sites offering questionable health remedies and other products or services not to the business’ liking.
Privacy Matters
Web sites may collect information about visitors, whether through an online registration or order form or secretly through the capture of the visitor’s Internet protocol, or IP, address. Businesses often fail to put consumers on notice that these data are being gathered and as to the uses to which the data will be put. This opens the door for disclosures of consumer information that can lead to unsolicited email complaints and identity theft. Further, where the Web site may attract youthful populations, federal law requires parental consent and other important measures to protect children and their privacy.[2]
Advertising Claims
Just as in the real world, consumer protection laws govern claims made in advertising, testimonials, statements comparing competitive products, and more. Because the Internet puts these claims in the global arena, international, federal, foreign domestic, and a variety of state laws may apply. Businesses must carefully weigh the costs and the benefits in the form of risk avoidance presented by the potentially applicable patchwork of laws. Fortunately, federal and state consumer protection laws in the United States are harmonized to a significant degree. The harmonization is not complete, however.
Conclusion
Web sites present an abundance of legal issues for consideration. Some, such as the issues presented by linking policies, are wholly unique to the Internet. Other issues are more traditional in nature, but emerge in new and thought-provoking ways in application to Web sites. We hope this article serves as a useful issue-spotting guide to entrepreneurs and businesses.
[1] Netcraft, October 2007 Web Server Survey, http://news.netcraft.com/archives/2007/10/index.html (visited Mar. 23, 2008); Netcraft, New York Internet and ThePlanet Most Reliable Hosting Companies in December 2006,
[2] See generally Federal Trade Commission, Implementing the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act: A Report to Congress (Feb. 2007).
RESOURCE NOTES:
BigStockImages.com offers some terrific resources, including links to free images and tutorials. Check it out here.
Netcraft, cited in the first paragraph, is a great resource for Web-based statistics to include in business plans and pro forma analyses. This English company offers useful statistics worldwide. For an overview and to a newsletter sign-up, click here.
We hope the information here will be helpful to you. Please note, however, that, as always, information posted on this blog does not constitute legal advice, and your visits to this blog or contacts to us regarding the information posted here do not establish an attorney-client relationship. For more information, please contact us at 208.939.4472 or info@technologylawgroup.com.